tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22852611433650541.post4583575458953154756..comments2023-09-27T06:14:54.697-07:00Comments on The Architecture of Fear: Building Code -> Security Code?g+ahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03975351125605426090noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22852611433650541.post-91627067923170414192009-06-14T04:34:10.067-07:002009-06-14T04:34:10.067-07:00architects in bangalore as modern architectural fi...<a href="http://www.architectsban.webs.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">architects in bangalore</a> as modern architectural firm working as<a href="http://www.seekangroup.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">architects in bangalore</a> know more about Green eco architectural designs are reusable materials, green designs etc.. ..… Create an Eco friendly Green design… Save Earth.. <a href="http://www.interiordesignersbangalore.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">interior designers in Bangalore</a> as of natural materials <a href="http://www.interiordesignersinbangalore.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">interior designers in Bangalore</a> with almost modern concepts <a href="http://www.architectsbangalore.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">architects in bangalore</a> eco friendly architectural solutions for <a href="http://www.architectsinbangalore.co.in/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"> architects in bangalore</a> , <a href="http://www.seekangroup.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">interior designers in bangalore</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22852611433650541.post-6118774203849761752008-11-10T07:10:00.000-08:002008-11-10T07:10:00.000-08:00Good words.Good words.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22852611433650541.post-43101264812881083892007-03-25T14:52:00.000-07:002007-03-25T14:52:00.000-07:00I'd also prefer to see that architecture pose its ...I'd also prefer to see that architecture pose its own questions without the imposition of the answers in systematized code. One thing I can't help but think about however is how the imposition of the building code was received during its beginnings and how now after (quite) some time it can be viewed as vague and open to interpretation. Would something like that happen again if security measures were introduced into the code? I'm not sure I really want to find out.g+ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03975351125605426090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22852611433650541.post-91885188503248618842007-03-25T05:28:00.000-07:002007-03-25T05:28:00.000-07:00Personally, I'm somewhat grateful that no real att...Personally, I'm somewhat grateful that no real attempt to formalize top-to-bottom reform of the building code occurred post 9-11. Things have changed, obviously (I refer here, again, to the Citicorp building and, more specifically, to Ouroussoff's review of the SF Federal Building by Morphosis that I think you missed while away), but the most useful aspect of building codes and zoning laws for a particular type of architectural practice seems to be that they are so vaguely defined that they invite creative interpretation and transgression. One way to ask the question in reverse (and with more agency on the creative potential of architecture) would perhaps be, how can architecture respond to, say, changes in security codes? Or how can architecture pose its own questions about defensible architecture without having them answered for us?Jeanniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07027187393868159396noreply@blogger.com